Analyst Criticizes Selective Enforcement of Anti-Terrorism Laws, Raises Concerns Over Sheikh Gumi’s Activities

Public affairs analyst Barrister Darlington Agomuo has raised concerns about what he described as unequal application of Nigeria’s anti-terrorism laws. Speaking in an interview on Voice of the People, Agomuo questioned why some individuals face prosecution while others allegedly operate without accountability.

Agomuo said, “Sheikh Gumi is running another terrorist organization, which he goes to commune with,” referencing the cleric’s reported interactions with armed groups in the Sahel region. He contrasted this with the prosecution of leaders of groups such as the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), arguing that the legal system appears inconsistent.

He stated that the government has failed to take action against individuals who allegedly facilitate violence in northern Nigeria, claiming that this perceived imbalance contributes to insecurity and public distrust.

Agomuo also criticized aspects of judicial practice, noting that courts sometimes cite foreign jurisprudence despite existing Supreme Court guidance emphasizing reliance on Nigerian law.

Comparing the prosecution of IPOB leader Nnamdi Kanu with the lack of action against other violent actors, Agomuo argued that focusing on statements rather than proven violent acts undermines confidence in the justice system.

He warned that unless authorities address all sources of violence—domestic and external—equally, insecurity and public discontent are likely to continue.